Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
These standard slashers don’t really need a synopsis but here we go! – Under a campfire on a dark night Max (Neumann), owner of a camp for gifted children, tells staff and campers the tale of Madman Marz (Ehlers); a deranged farmer who slaughtered his family in a nearby house. Legend has it that if you speak his name above the sound of a whisper he’ll come for you.
madman - Mad-Madman-Marz.jpg
Review Madman (1981)
Director Joe Giannone
Writers Joe Giannone (story and screenplay) and Gary Sales (story)
Cast Gaylen Ross (billed here as “Alexis Dubin”), Tony Fish, Harriet Bass, Seth Jones, Jan Claire, Alex Murphy, Tom Candela, Frederick Neumann and Paul Ehlers
“One by one you’ll start to fall before night’s over” – Max
madman - Mad-Campfire.jpg

These standard slashers don’t really need a synopsis but here we go! – Under a campfire on a dark night Max (Neumann), owner of a camp for gifted children, tells staff and campers the tale of Madman Marz (Ehlers); a deranged farmer who slaughtered his family in a nearby house. Legend has it that if you speak his name above the sound of a whisper he’ll come for you.

The staff consists of Betsy (Ross) and her kinda’ boyfriend TP (Fish), couples Ellie (Claire) and Bill (Murphy), free spirit Stacy (Bass) and jokester Dave (Jones). When one of the campers, Richie (Candela), goes missing each of the staff goes out searching for him one by one. Awaiting in the woods is Madman Marz who greets them in memorable ways.

madman - Mad-Gaylen-Ross.jpg

“Madman” is a good example of the typical slasher formula done right. The best backwoods slasher, IMO, will always be “Friday the 13th” (1980) and it was, undoubtedly, a hugely influential horror film as well.  Numerous copycats came afterwards that utilized the woods scenario with plenty of disposable victims and the films varied considerably in quality to say the least. “Madman” is one of the good ones as it serves up a scary villain, utilizes the setting well and provides enough nastiness and gore to score high as a top ranking copycat.

It’s not without it’s flaws and a few “what were they thinking!” moments but all the key elements are handled admirably. The moody atmosphere is established in the very first frame with a nicely staged campfire scene and the telling of the legend of Madman Marz. A rather nice touch is a foreshadowing of sorts as the key characters are shown in life and death situations as the camera introduces them to the audience. It’s not like most viewers won’t already know how they’ll end up anyway so, for me, the scene left an impression and worked well.

madman - Mad-Tony-Fish.jpg

The characters are fairly likeable and just interesting enough to register at the basic level. The performers are quite decent as well but top honours go to Ross (“Dawn of the Dead” – ’78) and Fish (his only film credit) is also very likeable as a somewhat typical horn dog who reveals hidden depths. The screen kills range from deliriously nasty to fairly pedestrian but make-up effects are well done so the mayhem looks splendid.

Directing duties, writing, cinematography, and lighting are all very competent and bordering on impressive. There’s a number of stylish, and creepy, imagery on display here that leaves a lasting memory. There’s quite a bit of suspense created in the standard stalking sequences and the setting ends up being quite the creepy place. As said earlier the film is not above the usual dim-wittedness in character’s decision making but it’s never too distracting as to kill the suspense.

madman - Mad-Madman-Marz-2.jpg

The mood is genuinely well sustained throughout the feature and blissfully free of self-parody and that’s, in the end, what places “Madman” in the upper tier of backwoods slashers. The nihilistic ending makes sure the feature goes out with a bang and leaving things, of course, open for a sequel. No such thing materialized for this “Madman” but as a standalone it’s a must see for slasher aficionados.

Physical Copy

My copy of “Madman” is the region free Blu-ray from Vinegar Syndrome that was issued in 2015. It sports fantastic A/V quality despite the fact that the print comes with inherent damage. The imperfections only add to it’s charms but, seriously, the image is absolutely gorgeous. I have a few Blu-ray’s issued by this label and they are all fantastic in the technical department. Extras wise the disc is loaded; among them a feature length making-of documentary, additional interviews, commentaries, trailers, TV spots etc. It’s also subtitled.
Arrow Video also issued a release for the film in 2015.

madman - Mad-Bluray.jpg

Why physical copy?

I always encourage the acquisition of physical copies as I dread the day when films will only exist as files on computers and through streaming services. The companies that put the effort into making the discs, create new artwork or reproduce the originals, issue booklets and much more deserve all the financial support they can. Therefore I will always mention the Blu-rays or DVD’s (and yes; also if I review something streamed through Netflix or the like) even though I gain nothing from it personally.

Oddur BT

Oddur BT

I mostly enjoy writing about films that fit into the category „Cult“ in one way or another. It‘s, frankly, where my comfort zone lies. It would be easy to just focus on horror films (by far the most films labeled „Cult“ are horror films) but the category also includes so many films that are really un-classifiable. Many of these movies are so truly enjoyable and you don‘t even know exactly why. These are often films that are considered very poor, very cheap, very amateurish and some are just plain old studio films that got panned or performed very poorly when released. This is the stuff I like to write about and I hope you like reading about.

Leave a Reply

About Me

I mostly enjoy writing about films that fit into the category „Cult“ in one way or another. It‘s, frankly, where my comfort zone lies. It would be easy to just focus on horror films (by far the most films labeled „Cult“ are horror films) but the category also includes so many films that are really un-classifiable. Many of these movies are so truly enjoyable and you don‘t even know exactly why. These are often films that are considered very poor, very cheap, very amateurish and some are just plain old studio films that got panned or performed very poorly when released. This is the stuff I like to write about and I hope you like reading about.

Recent Posts

Scroll to Top