Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
A classic British horror film not necessarily in terms of quality but rather as a fun time capsule of an era long gone and a mood that was only attainable for a short period of time.
haunted-house-of-horror - HHoH-Kill-scene.jpg
Review The Haunted House of Horror (1969)
Director Michael Armstrong
Writer Michael Armstrong (screenplay) and Gerry Levy (additional material)
Cast Frankie Avalon, Jill Haworth, Mark Wynter, Gina Warwick, Richard O’Sullivan, Carol Dilworth, Julian Barnes, Veronica Doran, Robin Stewart, George Sewell and Dennis Price
“I am bored. Just wish something would happen” – Sheila

The back of the Blu-ray edition has this as a synopsis: “This Tigon British classic sees a group of jaded youth, from swinging sixties London dare each other to go to a deserted mansion, that once saw a mad man slice up his whole family. Once there the group are picked off one by one and, in a twisted turn of events, the remaining survivors must figure out who is behind these brutal killings before it’s too late”. That’s not the most accurate description for “The Haunted House of Horror”; indeed a classic British horror film not necessarily in terms of quality but rather as a fun time capsule of an era long gone and a mood that was only attainable for a short period of time.

haunted-house-of-horror - HHoH-Group.jpg

Said youths consist of Chris (Avalon) and his girlfriend Sheila (Haworth), Gary (Wynter) and his date Dorothy (Dilworth), Sylvia (Warwick) who’s sort of Gary’s ex, couples Peter (O’Sullivan) and Madge (Doran) and finally stand-alones Richard (Barnes) and Henry (Stewart). The group decides to visit a supposedly haunted house to liven things up a bit. When one of the gang is brutally murdered by an unseen assailant panic ensues among the group. Chris declares that it’s most likely that one of them is the murderer and suggests they hide the body and figure out among themselves what would be the best next move. Subsequently an Inspector (Price) goes investigating a missing person and add into the mix a jealous ex (Sewell) of Sylvia who gets tangled up in the mystery. Still no closer to discovering who’s the guilty party the group returns to the house once more.

haunted-house-of-horror - HHoH-Girls.jpg

A feature length documentary and a booklet accompanying the Blu-ray release stress the point excessively that “The Haunted House of Horror” was not the picture that writer and director Michael Armstrong had in mind. Interference from studio execs and extra footage shot by another director (Levy) created a hybrid out of Armstrong’s original script titled “The Dark” which he was not pleased with. The visual flow of the film isn’t severely compromised although it’s easy to spot a few instances in the beginning that are clearly the work of two contrasting directors. There are some fairly big holes in the plot; namely how on earth the group comes to the conclusion that hiding the body is the best way to go and secondly what they could possibly gain by going back to the house near the end. I haven’t gone through the commentary on this release so I don’t have a blow by blow account of what was Armstrong’s intention but, remarkably enough, “The Haunted House of Horror” does fly by pretty pleasantly.

haunted-house-of-horror - HHoH-Wynter-Warwick.jpg

The core idea isn’t bad although narratively speaking this isn’t a very logical film. Supposedly haunted houses are always ripe for something horrific to occur and (a very young at the time; 24 years old) director Armstrong creates a suitably eerie mood once inside the place and stages one heck of a set piece when a member of the group is viciously murdered. It’s a very nasty and bloody scene and a case could be made that it’s a bit of a precursor to future slasher films which were on the horizon but still a few years away. It’s also quite stylish with memorable imagery. The mystery angle which follows is never very gripping and, according to Armstrong, contains some added material which he didn’t intend for. The biggest change here is apparently the inclusion of a married man who’s been having an affair with Sylvia and won’t let her go despite her dumping him. While his narrative function sets up an extra kill scene, a bigger part for Warwick and doesn’t contain any plot holes per se it does look and feel like filler material. But at least Sewell is a quality actor and Warwick gets some extra scenes. In fact most of the actors here are pretty decent. Avalon leads the pack as the fairly unlikable Chris and the crooner puts in a good performance. Wynter is very appealing as Gary and Haworth and Dilworth come off well also.

haunted-house-of-horror - HHoH-Avalon.jpg

The final revelation is a bit out there (again according to Armstrong something that was severely altered) but the final showdown is memorably staged with intense, and bloody, scenes that make sure the film ends on a high. I’m inclined to believe Armstrong when he says that his cut was edgier but the resultant hybrid that is “The Haunted House of Horror” contains enough to recommend it to cult enthusiasts if no one else. The late sixties mood, lingo and fashions are really attractively displayed here and create a feel that’s most enjoyable to watch. The soundtrack isn’t bad either. Add to the mix a murder mystery with a creepy atmosphere and memorable kill scenes and you’ve got something that’s well worth your time.

Physical Copy

My copy of “The Haunted House of Horror” is the UK Blu-ray edition from Screenbound. It’s a really attractive package that features top notch A/V presentation (the film looks spectacular), a feature length documentary that’s very informative, a commentary, a collectible booklet, poster and lobby cards. This is a genuine labour of love from the label. Which makes it so infuriating that it doesn’t contain any subtitles. Subtitles should be a given, especially with deluxe editions such as this one and it’s a shame that this fabulous package misses out on that front.

haunted-house-of-horror - HHoH-Blu-ray.jpg

Why physical copy?

I always encourage the acquisition of physical copies as I dread the day when films will only exist as files on computers and through streaming services. The companies that put the effort into making the discs, create new artwork or reproduce the originals, issue booklets and much more deserve all the financial support they can. Therefore, I will always mention the Blu-rays or DVD’s (and yes; also, if I review something streamed through Netflix or the like) even though I gain nothing from it personally.

Oddur BT

Oddur BT

I mostly enjoy writing about films that fit into the category „Cult“ in one way or another. It‘s, frankly, where my comfort zone lies. It would be easy to just focus on horror films (by far the most films labeled „Cult“ are horror films) but the category also includes so many films that are really un-classifiable. Many of these movies are so truly enjoyable and you don‘t even know exactly why. These are often films that are considered very poor, very cheap, very amateurish and some are just plain old studio films that got panned or performed very poorly when released. This is the stuff I like to write about and I hope you like reading about.

Leave a Reply

About Me

I mostly enjoy writing about films that fit into the category „Cult“ in one way or another. It‘s, frankly, where my comfort zone lies. It would be easy to just focus on horror films (by far the most films labeled „Cult“ are horror films) but the category also includes so many films that are really un-classifiable. Many of these movies are so truly enjoyable and you don‘t even know exactly why. These are often films that are considered very poor, very cheap, very amateurish and some are just plain old studio films that got panned or performed very poorly when released. This is the stuff I like to write about and I hope you like reading about.

Recent Posts

Scroll to Top